Prediction of Laurynas Grigelis vs Ivan Nedelko Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

HEAD TO HEAD

L. Grigelis vs I. Nedelko

Laurynas Grigelis
Laurynas Grigelis

Flag LTU LTU

w
w
w
l
w
l
w
w
l
l
Ivan Nedelko
Ivan Nedelko

Flag RUS RUS

w
l
w
w
l
w
l
l
w
l

0

Win

0

Played

0

Win

34
Age
39
6'0" (183 cm)
Height
6'1" (185 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
896
183
Best Rank
235
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$36.3K
Career Money
$8.8K
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Grigelis 0 - 0 Nedelko

The last match between Laurynas Grigelis and Ivan Nedelko was at the Lithuania F1, 20-07-2015, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Draw getting the victory w/o.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Grigelis0
Nedelko0
Last 1 H2H Matches:

(QFLithuania F1(07-20-15)

Clay
LTU Flag
Laurynas Grigelis
w/o
RUS Flag
Ivan Nedelko

L. Grigelis vs I. Nedelko H2H Profile

Stats
$36,285Career Prize Money$8,850
60.46% (477-312)Career Total W/L61.57% (665-415)
27Titles28
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

L. Grigelis vs I. Nedelko Match Preview:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Laurynas Grigelis has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Ivan Nedelko has won 41.27%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Laurynas Grigelis, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ivan Nedelko has won 48.39%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 27.01% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Laurynas Grigelis has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ivan Nedelko has saved 48.47% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Laurynas Grigelis has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Ivan Nedelko winning 56.67% (W/L 17/13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Laurynas Grigelis has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 181/103), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 41% (W/L 7/10). Ivan Nedelko has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 553/297), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/2).
  • Player level: In the last year, Laurynas Grigelis has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Ivan Nedelko has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60.87% of matches (W/L 14/9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Laurynas Grigelis has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Ivan Nedelko has played against players with an average rank of 330.93.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Laurynas Grigelis has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ivan Nedelko has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Laurynas Grigelis has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ivan Nedelko has converted 40.38% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Laurynas Grigelis vs Ivan Nedelko Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Grigelis 0%, Nedelko 48%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Grigelis 0%, Nedelko 53%.
Break Points Saved %: Grigelis 0%, Nedelko 58%.

L. Grigelis Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
GrassDavis Cup, Group I, PO, PAK-LTU 3-2 - 28-02-2022

Rubber 1

PAKA. Khan
L
7-6(5) 3-6 6-3
HardM15 Monastir - 19-04-2021

QF

ITAO. Giacalone
L
6-7(4) 6-4 6-2

R2

FRAA. Bouquier
W
6-1 7-6(5)

R1

FRAL. Tessa
W
6-1 6-3
HardM15 Monastir - 12-04-2021

R2

BRAG. Klier
L
6-3 6-3

I. Nedelko Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardSoma Bay Challenger - 17-11-2025

Q3

CZED. Kellovsky
L
6-7(4) 6-0 6-2

Q1

BLRS. Betov
W
6-3 6-1
HardM25 Manama - 10-11-2025

R1

INDM. Sureshkumar
L
6-2 2-6 6-4
HardM15 Manama - 03-11-2025

R2

POLO. Pieczkowski
L
6-3 6-4

R1

GBRZ. Stephens
W
6-3 7-6(0)
banner

L. Grigelis vs I. Nedelko Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
60.46% (477/312)YTD Win/Loss61.57% (665/415)
58.03% (1069/773)Sets Win/Loss59.41% (1440/984)
53.14% (9273/8178)Games Win/Loss53.57% (11909/10323)
57.67% (124/91)Hard Win/Loss51.37% (94/89)
63.73% (181/103)Clay Win/Loss65.06% (553/297)
60.44% (165/108)Indoor Hard W/L40.00% (18/27)
41.18% (7/10)Grass Win/Loss0.00% (0/2)
0.29Aces Per Game0.12
2493Aces Total1276
0.15Double Faults Per Game0.12
1308Total Double Faults1295
1st MatchAverage Match Time1st Match
622.41Average Opponent Rank554.39
61% (18476/30406)1st Serve %58% (22162/38493)
72% (13279/18476)1st Serve Win %66% (14664/22162)
50% (5984/11930)2nd Serve Win %50% (8156/16330)
43% (1278/2983)Break Points Won % (Total)47% (2060/4396)
39% (12420/31675)Return Points Win %44% (16447/37777)
42.86% (6/8)Slam W/L0.00% (0/2)
38.71% (12/19)Cups W/L0% (0/0)
38.10% (8/13)Main Tour W/L19.05% (4/17)
50.67% (152/148)Challenger W/L32.37% (45/94)
70.69% (299/124)Futures W/L67.10% (616/302)
61% (460/758)Best of 3 Sets Win %63% (651/1041)
48% (11/23)Best of 5 Sets Win %29% (2/7)
52% (141/271)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)56% (145/259)
55% (132/239)Deciding Set Win %60% (174/292)
86% (465/400)1st Set Won, Won Match90% (639/575)
14% (465/64)1st Set Won, Lost Match10% (639/62)
23% (324/74)1st Set Lost, Won Match20% (440/89)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

02:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction
CZEZ. Kolar7
ESPJ. B. Cosano
W1
1.43
W2
2.58
05:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction
BRAG. Heide
BRAL. S. FrancaWC
W1
1.003
W2
11
01:30 PM 18/11/25
Prediction
EGYA. ElsayedWC
GBRC. RobertsonJR
W1
1.83
W2
1.85
04:30 PM 18/11/25
Prediction
SVKM. Karolq
ITAA. Pellegrino6
W1
1.47
W2
2.46
08:30 PM 18/11/25
Prediction
RUSS. Gulinq
FRAC. Tabur5
W1
2.88
W2
1.35
12:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction
MDAR. Albot
UKRV. Orlov
W1
1.37
W2
2.8